A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From November 1, 200 to February 7, 2014, the Defendant was working as a inorganic contract worker in Gwangju-gu Office, Gwangju-gu. On December 2012, 2012, the Defendant told the victim who received the question of whether the victim “I may help him to be employed as a street cleaners in the Gu office.” The Defendant said that the victim “I am aware of the fact” from the victim, who received the question of whether the victim “I can get him to be employed as a street cleaners in the Gu office in the middle of Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu.”

At the time, the defendant is not aware of the fact that there is a vacancy in the process of employing the street cleaners, and there is no plan to help the employment of the victim, and there is no other person employed as a street cleaners, and even if he receives the money in the name of the employment cost from the victim, it was thought that it will be used as a stock investment or personal living cost.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on December 2, 2012, once again worked in a restaurant located in the Dong-dong, Gwangju, Chungcheongnam-gu, Gwangju, to help the victim be employed as a street cleaners. Before being employed by another person, the Defendant was employed by the street cleaners who received KRW 35 million from another person, and was in need of a level of KRW 40 million prior to being employed as a day-to-day. In order to be employed as a method of mechanism employment, the Defendant may be employed within a rapid period of 3 to 4 months and be on a one-year basis if late at that time.” The Defendant received KRW 20 million from the victim for cash 20,000 won contained in the E multilateral bag located in the Eth page located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju. On January 1, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 20 million from the victim’s account in the name of the Defendant community credit cooperatives.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim C, thereby taking the total of KRW 40 million from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of a Tong.