A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has worked as a street cleaners (inorganic contract position) in the cleaning administration division of the Gu office.

1. On November 2, 2010, the Defendant against the victim D calls from the C-Gu office located in Seoul E, thereby falsely stating that “B’s private village type is serving at the Seoul Metropolitan Government Office, and the victim D, who was a working partner, is employed by the private village type, and is employed by the private village type as a cleaning source of the C-gu office, thereby changing the amount of KRW 10 million from the street funds to KRW 10 million.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a dead degree of relationship with the Seoul Metropolitan Government Office, and there was no intention or ability to find the victim's fraud as a cleaning source of the C-Gu Office, and the defendant had a plan to use the victim's money as entertainment expenses, etc.

As above, the Defendant received a false statement from the victim to the bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and received KRW 10 million from the victim.

2. Around June 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim G expressed that, in a mutually influent restaurant in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the victim G who is a dong in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, three public officials in technical service retired from office in December of this year from the personnel division of the Cgu Office and three public officials in technical service were employed in a closed manner, and four employees were employed as public officials in technical service in the C-gu Office.”

Around August 2012, the Defendant told the victim at the Defendant’s accommodation located in 205, Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H building 205, that “The three director-general of the Cgu Office will deliver an overseas trip of KRW 6 million, first of all, to the Defendant.”

However, on December 2012, the Gu Office did not have a plan to employ a public official in technical service, and the defendant had a plan to receive money from the victim to use it as entertainment expenses, etc.

As above, the Defendant got a false statement and received from the victim the above H building 205 to 6 million won under the pretext of street funds.