A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【2017 Height 20】

1. On November 25, 2016, the Defendant driving a motor device license at approximately 150 meters away from the Defendant’s house located in the Seoul Special Self-Governing Province, to the front road located in the same Eup/Myeon-ro of the same Eup/Myeon on the 17:40-round November 25, 2016, without obtaining a motor device license from the 150-meter section of the blood alcohol concentration 0.121% while under the influence of alcohol.

2. Despite the fact that the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Loss, the Defendant operated the said motor vehicle which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

[2017 Highest 56] On November 28, 2016, the Defendant was indicted for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), etc. at the Daegu District Court’s Daegu District Court’s Young-gu Branch on the ground of a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and is currently pending trial. On January 25, 2017, the Defendant is a person who was detained for the same offense in the same court and is currently pending trial two times or more in the past.

3. On March 16, 2017, the Defendant driven an 110c erotobane without a license, in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.102% from a section of about 700 meters to the road located in the same Eup from the front apartment of the ean apartment located in the Ulsan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 14:09 to the front road in the same Eup.

4. Despite the fact that the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Loss, the Defendant operated the above urba without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (3).

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Order 20] Defendant’s legal statement D’s report on the state of driving, report on the state of driver’s circumstances, notification on the crackdown on drinking driving, and vehicle driver’s license register.