logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고단6335
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The accused is a person engaged in the business of driving BM7 cars in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving).

On September 18, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.066% in blood without obtaining a driver’s license on September 18, 2017, and led the said car to take the front of Daegu-gu C, Daegu-gu, into the stolue-distance outflow from the Kaol Hospital’s bank.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of the victim D(33) drive of the victim D(33 S) due to the following negligence, and received the said SM7 car’s back panion part.

After all, the Defendant suffered from the victim D and his son F (the age of 22) by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, respectively, the Defendant suffered approximately two weeks of the cryp and the tension in need of treatment.

2. As a result of measuring the alcohol concentration in blood by driving a car as above, the Defendant: (a) committed a pro-friendly H’s behavior with a police officer having knowledge of his/her usual resident registration number at the site as well as his/her punishment for such behavior; and (b) committed an attempt to gather the punishment on the police officer G who was dispatched to the site due to concerns that his/her degree of alcohol concentration in blood would rise to 0.066%; and (c) drive without a license.

On September 18, 2017, at around 02:07, the Defendant: (a) sent to police officers G a “K” resident registration number of H; (b) signed a driver H next to the driver of the notification letter of the result of crackdown on driving of alcohol containing alcohol concentration in blood while in the blood; (c) written the name of H in the name column of the statement report on the driver’s circumstances of the main driver; and (d) submitted the notification of the result of crackdown on driving of alcohol; and (c) written the statement report on the driver’s report on driving of alcohol to police officers G.

In this respect.

arrow