logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고단4024
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the Daegu District Court on July 29, 2013, is a person who has a record of driving alcohol twice or more by receiving a fine of KRW 4 million from the same court on September 27, 2014 due to the same offense, etc., and receiving a fine of KRW 5 million from the same court.

1. On June 18, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.116% in blood without obtaining a driver’s license for a vehicle from around 20:20 on June 18, 2017, and driving DK7 vehicles from the front side of the Bosung apartment apartment in Daegu-gu New Cancerdong to the front side of C in the same Gu.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, forging a private document, or uttering of the above-mentioned document, as a result of measuring the alcohol concentration in blood while driving a car as above, was aware of his/her usual resident registration number to police officers E who sent to the site due to concerns that the numerical value would turn to 0.116% and additional discovery of non-licenseed driving and fines.

F pedling and gathering punishment.

On June 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 20:37, around 20:37, sent to police officers E a “G” which is a F’s resident registration number to verify the identity; (b) signed the F’s name on the driver’s side of the notification of the result of regulating drinking driving, which includes the alcohol concentration in blood; and (c) signed the F’s name in the name column of the statement report on the driver’s circumstantial statement; and (d) submitted to police officers the notification of the result of regulating drinking driving; and (c) the statement report on the situation of the driver’s license.

As a result, the Defendant unlawfully used F’s resident registration number and forged the F’s name of “Notice on the Result of Drinking Driving Control”, “Report on the Statement of the State Drivers’ Situation”, which is a private document to prove the fact for the purpose of exercising, and held the “Notification on the Result of Drinking Control” and “Report on the Statement of the State Drivers’ Circumstances”, which is a forged private document, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow