A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 25, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.066% from blood in the front line of Seoul Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul on December 25, 2015, driving the Defendant’s DNA 500 meters level of alcohol.

2. On December 25, 2015, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) confirmed the Defendant’s personal information by a police officer belonging to the Seoul Jungdong Police Station E District Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report at the above place on December 25, 2015; (b) confirmed the Defendant’s personal information; and (c) granted F the Defendant’s resident registration number of G, who was going to a usual meeting, as if he was the Defendant’s resident registration number.

3. Counterfeiting a private signature and exercising a signature on the investigation;

A. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same place as the above 2 paragraph, stated that the above F was G at will without authority for the purpose of exercising as if the Defendant was the above G, and used the signature by intentionally entering it into G in the personal column on the voluntary accompanying consent form without authority. The Defendant forged the signature, and continuously delivered the written voluntary accompanying consent form in the name of forged G to the above F as if the signature was duly formed.

B. On December 25, 2015, around 21:36, the Defendant committed the act as if the Defendant was the said G, responded to the measurement of drinking due to the suspicion of driving alcohol under paragraph (1) above, and signed it with the driver column on the report on detection of the driver at the State without authority for the purpose of exercising the right to use the said G, and forged the signature, and continuously issued the report on detection of the driver at the State, who signed the said report, as if it was duly constituted a genuine agreement to F of the process belonging to the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Central Police Station E zone, which was aware of the fact.

(c)

Defendant 3-B, at the time, and at the place described in the above paragraph 3-B, was carried out as if the Defendant was the above G, followed the measurement of drinking under the suspicion of driving alcohol under the above paragraph 1 and was in the driver column in the statement report without authority for the purpose of exercising the right.