logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.26 2013고단4925
마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In spite of the fact that no one smokes marijuana, the defendant smokes marijuana as follows:

1. On March 20, 2012, the Defendant smoked marijuana in a way that, like tobacco possessed by H at a Rab club parking lot located near the performance hall located in the building where it is difficult to identify the name in the U.S. In the U.S. Aclon’s name at around the performance hall located in the building where it is difficult to identify the name, the Defendant, along with H, “G” Doz., Doz., Doz., Doz., and smoked by a way that a Gab club, like tobacco possessed by H, puts a fire at approximately 0.3g

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with H, smoked marijuana.

2. On October 2012, the Defendant, along with H, smoked marijuana by inserting approximately 0.3g of marijuana directly cultivated by H in the pipe for smoking at H’s residence in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and spreading a smoke generated by attaching a fire.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with H, smoked marijuana.

3. Around November 2012, the Defendant, along with H, smoked marijuana by inserting approximately 0.3ggg of marijuana directly cultivated by H in the pipe to smoke in JE-owned JP vehicles located near the entrance of Han River Park located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and spreading a smoke generated by attaching a fire.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with H, smoked marijuana.

4. Around December 2012, the Defendant, along with H, smoked marijuana by inserting approximately 0.3g of marijuana directly cultivated by H in the pipe for smoking in the Defendant’s residence located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and displaying a smoke generated by attaching a fire.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with H, smoked marijuana.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspects of the accused and H by the prosecution;

1. The prosecutor's statement to K;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written appraisal;

1. Article 61(1) of the former Narcotics Control Act (amended by Act No. 11690) on criminal facts

arrow