beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Criminal facts
The Defendant is a person who closed down his business on December 31, 2004, when he was running a lighting machine manufacturing company B and C, and went to China on January 23, 2005, and entered the Republic of Korea on November 3, 2019.
1. Crimes related to victims D;
A. On September 3, 2004, the Defendant: (a) on the back of a promissory note, the face value of C is KRW 27,000,000, the bill number E, the due date for payment, and November 26, 2004, the Defendant: (b) arbitrarily sealed the corporate name plate stating “F Bank HH HH H H H H H I, and affixed a seal to the corporate registration number of G which was newly inserted in advance.”
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged an endorsement in the name of G, which is recorded in the rights and obligations of promissory notes, which are securities.
The Defendant, including that, from the above date to November 2004, forged an endorsement in the name of the G Co., Ltd. five times in total, as shown in the list of crimes committed.
B. Around September 3, 2004, the Defendant issued to D a false promissory note which forged the endorsement at the parking lot of the office building of Gyeonggi-do, which is located in the city of the Government of Gyeonggi-do, and exercised it as if it had been duly formed.
The Defendant, including that, from the above date to November 22, 2004, issued to D a promissory note, which forged an endorsement in the name of the Bank of Korea, five times in total, as shown in the attached list of crimes.
C. On September 3, 2004, the fraud Defendant issued forged promissory notes to the victim D, as set forth in paragraph 1(a) at the above parking lot, and falsely concluded that “The amount equivalent to the face value shall be paid on the date of the payment on the face of the payment on the bill discount endorsed by the G in advance.”
However, in fact, the endorsement of the above promissory note was forged, and the defendant was in financial difficulties due to business depression.