logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.28 2018고단7614
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 19, 2018, at around 01:05, the Defendant: (a) six police officers, such as police officers E belonging to the Incheon Yeonsu-gu Incheon Yeonsu-gu Police Station D District Zone D police officers, who were dispatched after receiving a report that there was a person assaulting the C Hospital located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Incheon, and reported on May 19, 2018, intend to arrest the Defendant’s private village F F in flagrant offender under suspicion of assault. “The head of the household does not have

Before 200, 2000 200 20 200 20 200 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

C. Bab Mabb. Domin, and the police officer’s f.m. “Ye f.b. Dob f. f. Dob f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

In order to keep this dog wres "Woo", the police officer's body opened the front of E with his/her body, cut his/her arms by hand, and obstructed the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 316 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 316 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a crime of interference with the execution of official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) requires strict punishment for a crime detrimental to the State’s function by nullifying a legitimate exercise of public authority. The defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment on October 13, 2016 and two years of suspended execution and committed the instant crime during the suspended execution period. Meanwhile, the defendant recognized the instant crime and against his mistake during the suspended execution period; the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime; the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime; the defendant’s age, sex, sex, environment, motive and background of the instant crime, means and method of the instant crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the trial process shall be determined as the same sentence as the disposition.

arrow