logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2017.04.28 2017고단113
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 25, 2017, around 17:50, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) at a “F restaurant” restaurant operated by the victim E on the racing-si on February 25, 2017; (b) without any particular reason, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, interfered with the operation of the victim E restaurant by having the victim’s disturbance interfered with the operation of the restaurant by force.

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. The Defendant, at around 18:17 on the same day, received a report on business interference, etc. in front of the “G” as stated in paragraph (2) of the same day and called out by the Defendant, from the police officer I and police officer J of the racing police station, for whom he belonged to the police box.

Dystyphan dystropha.

I amba at home.

Anywhere, inter alia.

Dried Dried Driller

In order to hear the word “,” without any particular reason, the police officer made a brush that “I will see this fluor because there is any such fluor,” and used the brusation of the police officer’s face, such as spiting the brus, walking the fluor of the J on several occasions, walking the fluoring of the police officer, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties.

B. The Defendant, at around 18:40 on the same day, committed an assault, such as spiting or cutting down, on the face of the horse L, which is a police officer belonging to the above police box, on the same day. On the other hand, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties by assaulting the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the above police box, and was in front of the brine at the above police box.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and I;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (related to violence in the toilet before entering the ward), investigation report (related to violence in the ward of the victim), investigation report (in the ward of the accused), investigation report (in the ward of the accused), investigation report (in the ward of the accused), investigation report (in the custody box A accompanied by a copy of the investigation report), investigation report (in the CCTV-fabing box inside the H box accompanied by a photograph), investigation report (in the case of report 12 attached

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) for criminal facts.

arrow