1. The insurance contract mentioned in paragraph 1 of the attached list is due with respect to the insured events described in paragraph 2 of the attached list.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed to be combined.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 20, 201, the Plaintiff entered into the instant insurance contract with the Defendant, Mez Drivers Insurance M-Dr 106 (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

-insured - The defendant - the beneficiary of the deceased insurance: Legal successor - the insurance period: from September 20, 201 to September 20, 2070 - Guarantees - General injury, death, and aftermathal disability (one million years of age): Payment when death or aftermathal disability occurs due to general injury (five million won of the purchase price) - Fines of 20 million won for private driving, etc.

B. The insurance contract of this case contains "special terms and conditions that guarantee injury during driving of a two-wheeled automobile". According to the above special terms and conditions, insurance money is not paid in the event the insured causes for payment of insurance money under the insurance contract of this case directly due to a sudden and remote accident that occurred while driving a two-wheeled automobile (including boarding a two-wheeled automobile). However, the above special terms and conditions apply only to the case where the insured owns, uses (limited to the case of periodically driving a two-wheeled automobile due to occupation, duties or activities of a club, etc.) and manages a two-wheeled automobile.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant special terms and conditions”) C.

Around 05:55 on October 5, 2014, the Defendant driven Oral Ba (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Oral Ba”), and driven the front road in front of C located in Orala-gu B in the Jeonju-si, the lower part of the freight vehicle parked on the right side of the above road was shocked into the front part of Defendant Oral Ba.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

According to the instant accident, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the “compact brain damage and thirral brain damage,” and the “Gradical spathy expenditure,” in which the detailed identity of an open wound is unknown.

(hereinafter “instant injury”). [Ground of recognition] There is no dispute, and Party A’s 2 through 2.