A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant knew that he was born in his name due to fraud, etc., and thought that he had forged his identification card to use to conceal his identity.

1. On October 2012, the Defendant forged an official document: (a) made a copy of the Defendant’s driver’s license at C Office located in Jindo-si B; (b) entered the part indicated in the name column of “A” in the copy; (c) entered the part indicated in the “A” in the birth year as “74” in the resident registration number; and (d) forged a copy of the driver’s license for the Defendant under the name of the Commissioner General of the Busan National Police Agency, which is a public document, for the purpose of exercising it by reproducing.

2. On January 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the above C Office, when E, the operator of the above practice hall, demanded the Defendant to verify his identity; (b) subsequently, the Defendant presented a copy of the forged driver’s license to E, who is aware of such forgery, as if he were a copy of the true driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on a forged driver's license;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders are deemed to have been sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for six months of imprisonment with prison labor for similar crimes. Since it is judged that the crime of this case has been committed again, the nature of the crime is inferior, it is determined as per Disposition.