A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 23, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Seoul Western District Court.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle B rocketing siren.

On June 13, 2020, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol on 0.085% during blood, was driven by the said rocketing car with a alcohol content of 0.085%, and entered the speed of four-lanes from the side of the west 464 south, Songpa-gu Seoul, Seoul, at the west 464, along the south of the west IC Intersection, toward which the Defendant cannot know by four-lanes between the four-lanes towards the veterans hospital.

At the same time, there were vehicles standing in the signal atmosphere, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent the accidents that see the parked vehicle by thoroughly operating the steering service while under the influence of alcohol and accurately operating the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, while driving strokely as seen above, received the back part of the victim C (T, South, 46 years old) who was under the signal waiting at the front of the signal at the front, and was driven by the Defendant as the front part of the said B rocketing car driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C and the victim E (the age of 39) who was on board the victim’s car by occupational negligence as above, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) Defendant 1 driven B rocketing car with alcohol content of about 0.085% at the 6km section from the date and time limit set out in the above paragraph 1 to the place set out in the above paragraph 1 on the roads adjacent to the customary market located in Hanam-si F.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving regulations not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. The written investigation of C’s statement in the Defendant’s legal statement 1.