logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.03.22 2017고단3387
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 28, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (divated driving) driven a Crocketing car with alcohol content of at least 0.276% from the section of approximately 200 meters, from the 709-9 front to the front of the same dong mar street, around September 28, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol by around 0.276%.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (after the accident) are those engaged in driving motor vehicles of rocketing sirens.

At the time set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant driven the above rocketing motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and driven the two-lane roads in front of the shooting distance of the members of the Ansan-si and the East Women's Center, along with the 21st century hospital located within the boundary of the Dong community service center.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the steering wheel and steering system by accurately operating the steering wheel and steering system.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant was negligent in drinking and proceeded along as it was, the Defendant was found to have been placed in the front part of the instant rocketing car by the victim D (Seoul, 56 years old) driving on the front side of the Defendant’s Mading-off vehicle, which was parked in the signal signal in one lane above the Defendant’s Mad-off.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, did not immediately stop the said passenger car to the extent of 778,068 won, and did not take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A report on a traffic accident, a report on the circumstances of the driver of a vehicle driving, notification of the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking, and a record of measurement of drinking;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow