logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산가정법원 2011.7.6.선고 2011드단2919 판결
친생부인
Cases

2011D 2919 Denial of Paternity

Plaintiff

HO (xxxx -xxx xx)

- - - - 000 manys of the address of Busan Youngdo-gu 00,000 - - -

Busan Youngdo-gu 0000 Simdo-gu -

- Seogpo City 00 - - Other

Defendant

001 ( XXXXXX - XXXXXXX )

-00 square meters 00 square meters -

Standard place of registration 00 - Dog- Dog

Principal of the case

inu. (No. 16. 14: 20 Busan Dong-gu 00 Do-dong, 00 Do-dong, November 14, 2010)

A male son born at a hospital

address address 00 Dong-dong 000 Domba-gu Busan Domba- Domba- Domb--

Conclusion of Pleadings

June 15, 201

Imposition of Judgment

July 6, 2011

Text

1. The principal of the case denies that he is the natural father of the defendant.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person.

Purport of claim

The order is as set forth in the text.

Reasons

In view of the overall purport of the pleadings in each period of evidence Nos. 1 and 2-3, evidence Nos. 3, evidence Nos. 4-1 through 3, evidence Nos. 5 and 6, the plaintiff and the defendant married on Oct. 14, 1988, but made a judicial divorce on Sept. 9, 2010, the plaintiff produced the principal of the case on Nov. 16, 2010, for which 300 days have not passed since the plaintiff got more than 30 days thereafter, the fact that the relationship between the principal of the case and the non-defendant and the principal of the case was established as a result of genetic testing.

According to the above facts of recognition, it is clear that the principal of the case is not the father of the defendant.

The plaintiff's claim is accepted with reasonable grounds.

Judges

Judge Lee Bo-young

arrow