2010 Pool 3229 Child Support

안○○ ( xxxxxx - XXXXXxx )

- 00-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City 00-dong-dong-Dong-dong-gu

Standard place of registration: 00 Doo-gu Busan Metropolitan City - Doo-

Attorney Song Do-young, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

In this regard, (xxx -xxx xx)

- - - - - - - - a --- a -- a -- a -- a -- a -- a -- an address.

Standard place of registration 00 Dong-gu Busan

Attorney Kim Yong-hoon, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

1.Etho (xx -xx -xx).

2 . 이▷♤ ( xxxxxx - xxxxxxx )

The domicile and reference domicile are the same as the plaintiff.

May 24, 2011

1. The claimant's claim is dismissed.

2. The cost of a trial shall be borne by each person.

The other party shall pay 20 million won per annum to the claimant with 20% interest per annum from the next day of the delivery of a copy of the petition for trial of this case to the day of complete payment.

1. According to the records and the results of the examination, the following circumstances are revealed.

A. On August 9, 1988, the claimant and the other party filed a marriage report with the principal of the case on the same day, and they filed a divorce agreement on July 26, 2001.

나 . 협의이혼 당시 청구인이 사건본인 이♤을 , 상대방이 사건본인 이○를 각 양 육하기로 하였으나 , 협의이혼 한달 후 상대방이 교통사고로 병원에 입원하게되어 , 청구 인이 사건본인 모두를 양육하게 되었다 .

다 . 현재 사건본인들은 모두 성년이 되어 사건본인 이○는 상대방의 도움으로 ♤ ☆학원에 다니고 있고 , 사건본인 이▷♤은 고등학교 졸업 후 상대방이 운영하는 회사 에서 근무하고 있다 .

2. Appellant’s assertion and judgment

The claimant asserts that the other party did not pay 300,000 won per month as child support at the time of receiving the objection of the principal of the case, and asserts that the other party did not pay it as child support, and sought payment of the sum of 20,000 won from November 2001 to June 201.

According to the records of No. 1 and No. 2, and the examination of the principal of this case, the claimant did not engage in any economic activity except where the principal of this case was discharged from drinking and gambling while raising the principal of this case, and the principal of this case was paid 40,000 won per month by being designated as a basic living recipient, and the principal of this case did not directly receive money from the principal of this case. The principal of this case was found to have used money from the other party for education, money, living expenses, etc., one week where the principal of this case directly received money from the other party. The principal of this case was found to have used money from the other party at the time of this case's child support, and the principal of this case was able to directly pay the principal of this case's money to the other party of this case, and the other party of this case was able to directly pay the child support to the principal of this case due to the fact that the principal of this case was able to use the money from 1005 to 205.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the claim of this case is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Yoon Jinari