logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.18 2017나2001194
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

However, in Paragraph 2, the judgment on the argument that the plaintiff emphasizes again is added.

2. Determination of the attached articles

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant high-ranking operation on the left-hand side of the instant case was carried out on the grounds of “the pelvise typosis and the pelvise typosis infection on the left-hand side,” respectively, on the ground that the instant high-ranking operation on the right-hand side of the instant case was carried out on the grounds of “the pelvise typoid typosis and the pelvise typoid infection on the left-hand side.” Even in the case of each of the above titles, the instant high-ranking operation on

In addition, according to the plaintiff's reply to medical advice (Evidence 6 of A), it is caused by the color of the mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal, and it cannot be viewed that the mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal

Since the anti-control operation on the left and right side of this case is not implemented due to the same disease, the payment rate of each of the following disability should not be added up.

B. First of all, the judgment on the left-hand side of the instant case does not seem to be distinguishable from each other by the name, as the Plaintiff’s assertion, between “the pelvise typosis and typosis typitis on the left-hand side of the instant case,” which directly caused the instant high-speed operation, and “the pelvise typosis and typosis typosis on the right-hand side,” which directly caused the instant high-speed operation. However, the issue of the instant case is whether the cause disease of the pelvise typosis on the left-hand side of the instant case is identical, and its judgment is not determined by whether each direct cause of the instant high-ranking operation coincides with each other.

In addition, it is true that the bloodless typoidr's bloodless typoid is caused by the pulmonary typosis of the typoid, and that the blood is separately existing on the left and right side of the blood which supplies blood to the typoid.

arrow