1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff concluded an insurance contract: (a) the Defendant, policyholder, and the insured, a company operating the insurance business, etc., as the Plaintiff; (b) on July 24, 2008, the Plaintiff concluded the C insurance contract and the D insurance contract, and (c) on April 26, 2013, respectively (hereinafter “each of the instant insurance contracts”).

(2) The terms and conditions of each of the instant insurance contracts stipulate that the insurer shall compensate for the loss incurred by the injury when the insurer suffered bodily injury due to a sudden and unexpected accident during the insurance period, and that the insurer shall pay the insurance proceeds for residual disability according to the payment rate fixed when the insurer, as a direct result of the above injury, has completely lost its function.

B. On October 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) was fluored on the ground of scarcity, and was administered by the F Hospital for a cardiopulmonary pulmonary lab; (b) as a result of the Plaintiff’s examination of the labocing system, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as having been infected by her hemal labitis on the ground of hemosis; (c) around that time, the Plaintiff took care of her employment volume scard (1m/km/g/day longer) for the treatment of her hemal disease; (d) on December 2, 2015, the Plaintiff appealed from around December 2, 2015 without any special credit; and (e) was diagnosed as having been diagnosed as having a labal labal labal labal labing on both sides, and was diagnosed as having received treatment on January 22, 2016.

The occurrence of the typoid typosis on both sides of the Plaintiff is caused by the side effects of the number of employment taken by the Plaintiff.

3) On February 4, 2016, the records of the F Hospital’s progress from February 4, 2016, the Plaintiff continued to be imprisoned by prescribing the employment volume stroke even after the examination of the stroke-mathrosis. (4) indicated that “I am stroke and have a stroke-mathrosis, if the stroke has a stroke-mathrosis, it would be concerned about the stroke-mathrosis.” - The stroke-ma will be more important in relation to the stroker salt.”

5 On November 9, 2016, the Plaintiff was subject to the reduction of the mission, which is a high-speed pipe, to the right.