1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 29, 2005, while serving in the military on April 19, 2004, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from the Armed Forces Capital Hospital to the end of July 2005, as the “Special Hemariosis” occurred, while serving in the military, and was diagnosed on May 2007 as the “Special Hemar Madalty Madalty Madalty Madalty Madalty on the left side.” On September 6, 2007, the Plaintiff was discharged from the hospital on February 29, 2008.

B. On February 29, 2008, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State under the applicant’s name on the following grounds: “The Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State under the applicant’s name: (a) on May 23, 2008, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the determination equivalent to the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that the said disease does not constitute a disease in the line of official duty.

C. Accordingly, on November 3, 2008, the Daegu District Court rendered a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff to the effect that the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed for the remaining parts of the judgment. The court rendered a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff to the effect that the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed for the remaining parts of the judgment. The court rendered a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff to the effect that the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed.

The defendant appealed against this, and the appellate court (Tgu High Court 2010Nu31), 2010

7.2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding the Plaintiff’s winning part of the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked and the Plaintiff’s claim corresponding to the revoked part is dismissed on the ground that “the Plaintiff’s injury caused by the stroke’s side effects in the course of treating the certificate of decrease in the blood plate, which is an immunodeficiency disease, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that there is a proximate causal relation between the above injury and the Plaintiff’s duty during his military service.”