1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 3, 2013, while the Plaintiff was employed as a daily worker for the development of the Bigtoria industry, and was performing the work to support the debris restaurant, the Plaintiff confirmed, on June 27, 2014, that the Defendant, around 11:00, a large number of sobryings in the Victotototop hotel, located in the 4-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, as the club staff (hereinafter “the instant accident”), brought about a sobrying accident (hereinafter “the instant case”), resulting in the said accident (hereinafter “the instant accident”) and following the said accident (hereinafter “the 1st accident”), which led to water treatment in the middle part of the body of Korea, and caused water treatment to aggravation of the symptoms that led to water treatment at the Nantop Hospital.

“In the instant case, the Defendant filed an application for medical care benefits with respect to the left-hand pelke, the left-hand pelle typosis (hereinafter “the instant injury”). B. On August 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on the Plaintiff on the ground of the medical opinion of the Defendant on May 23, 2014, the instant injury was an existing disease with no causal relation with the disaster; (b) on the ground that the disease was confirmed by the bloodless typology’s opinion on each side of the high-hand typoids; and (c) the instant injury was not a simple radiation (X-ra) as of May 19, 2014 and the record of the operation as of May 28, 2014, on the ground that the medical opinion of the Defendant on May 23, 2014 cannot be recognized as the medical treatment of the instant injury due to the instant accident (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

C. On November 4, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a request for review against the instant disposition. However, on January 9, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s request for review on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s video materials prior to the date of the Plaintiff’s disaster are observed on both sides, as the Plaintiff’s opinion on blood without blood transfusion from each side, and the point of collapse due to the left-hand anti-diverosis, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim was determined to have been an individual’s existing disease prior to the instant accident rather than the instant injury occurred.”