logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.10.29 2013고단812
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 18, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the Busan District Court Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court on August 10, 2010.

1. On April 15, 2008, at the office of D Co., Ltd., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., the Defendant, at the time of the Gyeonggi-si, borrowed the above money to A (E) in the amount of KRW 350,000,000,000: the date of repayment: 208; and 2008, the above money was borrowed to A (E) and would be responsible for the transfer of the claim to F; Provided, That the Defendant would pay interest at interest on April 15, 2008: (a) the address of the borrower: (b) the name: D, representative director; (c) the address; (d) the resident number; and (d) the resident number: (d) the name and output.

Then, the Defendant stated “5” and “10” in the column of the date of repayment of the loan certificate printed out as above using the mix, stated “5” and “3” in the column of the interest rate, and stated “15” in the column of the date in the column of the date of preparation, and stated “5” in the column of the address in the column of the borrower’s address, stating “501 in the name of the building C, the number column of the corporation, “G” and “H” in the column of the representative director, and affixed the seal of the D Co., Ltd. prepared in advance to the name following the name of the guarantor, and affixed his own seal on the name of the guarantor.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of loan in the name of H, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant: (a) presented a forged loan certificate to F without knowledge of the fact at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) as stated in paragraph (1); and (b) presented it as if it were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant asserts that he/she is not guilty as an act with H’s consent.

In the investigation process, H was called as a document directly produced by H or as a substitute for H.

or otherwise suspected.

arrow