1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (including “related Acts and subordinate statutes,” but excluding the part “3. conclusion”) is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following (2). Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2

2. The amended part 8 - 5 - 7 - is as follows:

2) In light of the above legal principles, in light of the following circumstances, the evidence presented by the Plaintiff and the result of the commission of part of the medical record appraisal on the deceased’s death and work, it is insufficient to acknowledge a proximate causal relationship between the deceased’s death and work, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

8 Under the 8th page, the term “shall not be seen,” and the term “shall not be seen...........” in the last place of the same conduct.

9 The same five parallels from the same 4 parallels shall be deleted.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.