logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.09.09 2020누35815
유족연금지급비대상결정처분취소의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the modification of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows, since the reason of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the annexed part of the judgment of the court of first instance (including "related Acts and subordinate statutes," but excluding "3. conclusion" part), it is quoted as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The portion revised on 2.3 sides below the 3th day and the 3th day below "no." The testimony of the witness E of the court of first instance is sufficient to recognize that the divorce between the deceased and the deceased was explicitly or implicitly consistent with the intention of divorce between the deceased and the deceased at the time of the death of the deceased, and there is no evidence to acknowledge this differently.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit, and the disposition of this case is legitimate.

A person shall be appointed.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow