1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the modification of the pertinent part of the judgment of the first instance as to this case as follows 2. Thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (including “related Acts and subordinate statutes,” but excluding the part “3. conclusion”). Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Under the 8th below the modified part, the phrase “before the basic design, the shop design and the execution design” shall be read as “before the execution of the work.”

9 The following shall be added to the right side of the 6 line below in the main sentence:

【The Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a report on the establishment of the industrial accident insurance relationship that he voluntarily prepared on or around January 20, 2015 on the premise that he is D’s employer. In the case of △△ Construction, the industrial accident insurance premium rate is 39/1,000, in the case of G, the industrial accident insurance premium rate for construction business was not applied, and all five companies engaged in drilling work in E project construction including the Plaintiff were classified as “other scientific and technological service businesses” and applied 7/1,000 industrial accident insurance rate for 7/1,00.

[Judgment]

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.