logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.03.28 2017누78577
법인세등부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as stated in the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows 2. Thus, it shall be accepted as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. The amended part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: “The Plaintiff did not disclose the amount calculated by adding up the expenses paid by each member of the business.” 8th seventh of the judgment of the court of first instance.

“The Plaintiff has not disclosed the personal information of each member of the business that claimed that the amount of the issue was attributed to the Plaintiff, and the amount and the time of attribution for each member of the business.

"Ero-friendly".

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow