A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 12, 2010, the defrauded concluded that “If investing money in money, the Defendant would jointly operate a coffee machine and distribute profits to the victim D” in front of the Daegu Northern-gu B “C” on a false basis.

However, at the time, the defendant was expected to use the debt repayment and living expenses even if he received money from the injured party even if he did not receive money from the injured party, and there was no plan to operate a coffee key business.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received cash 2.8 million won from the victim under the pretext of his investment; (c) from around May 3, 201, the Defendant was granted KRW 13.1 million in total eight times from that time until May 3, 201, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On January 31, 2011, the Defendant, without authority, forged one copy of the “application for accession”, which is a private document on rights and obligations, by stating the name and resident number of the said D in the “application form,” without the authority, with the intent to use the mobile phone (G) of LGU in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E (FE).

Around that time, the Defendant submitted forged “application for admission” to an employee who may know of the fact as if he were genuine and used the forged private document.

B. On February 8, 2011, the Defendant, without authority, forged a copy of “service application”, which is a private document on the applicant’s rights and obligations, with the intent to use the Internet telephone (I), Internet, and television set up at his own house of H1, Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, for the purpose of using it to install LGU’s Internet telephone (H), Internet, and Internet TV.

Around that time, the Defendant submitted a forged “service application” to an Internet installation engineer who is unaware of the fact as if he were genuine.