logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.04.12 2017고단4118
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 4118] The Defendant served as an employee in charge of attracting and managing subscribers from August 2012 to September 2014 at the LGU store located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and opened a mobile phone using her relative and personal information and sold it to a middle seller to acquire money.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On February 2, 2014, the Defendant, without authority, forged a copy of the application for mobile phone entry in the name of C, a private document related to the rights and obligations, stating “C”, “D”, and “Seoul Northern-gu E” in the subscription column without permission of C, using the pentle, with the intent of exercising the right at the LGU position located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

B. On February 5, 2014, the Defendant, without authority, forged an application for joining a mobile phone in the F’s name, which is a private document on his/her duty, stating that “F”, “G” in the resident registration number column, and “H apartment 105, 107,” in the customer address column, without permission of F, with the intent to exercise the right at the above LGU’s store.

2. Exercising the relevant investigation document;

A. On February 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around February 2, 2014, at the above LGU position, issued a copy of the application for joining the mobile phone in the name of forged C, as described in the above paragraph 1-A, to the above permanent store employees who are not aware of the fact; and (b) exercised the application.

B. On February 5, 2014, the Defendant, at the above LGU position, issued a copy of the application for membership of the F mobile phone in the F, as described in the above paragraph 1-B at the FGU position, to a person who is not aware of the fact, and exercised the application.

3. In the absence of a fact that around January 13, 2014, the Defendant was permitted by I to open a mobile phone in the name of I, the said LGU employees.

arrow