logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.12.08 2016고단4397
업무방해등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury, etc. by the Seoul Northern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 12th day of the same month, and is still in the grace period.

1. On September 22, 2016, the Defendant, at around 16:00 on September 22, 2016, listened to the victim D (hereinafter “E”) located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, referred to as “E,” while under the influence of alcohol to the victim that “I wish to use a telephone device in a way to run a telephone instead of informing the telephone number,” and the victim’s statement that “I want to run a telephone instead of informing the telephone number,” and “I do not run a mobile phone.” The Defendant continued to hear the victim’s statement that “I do not run a mobile phone,” and the victim’s statement that “I do not run a mobile phone, bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit son,” and it was difficult to see the victim’s statement that the customer was out of a coffee store.

The Defendant, by force, interfered with the victim’s coffee specialty business.

2. On October 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 08:00 on October 1, 2016, 2016, at the “E” coffee specialty store where the victim F (n, 21 years of age) works as an employee, the Defendant follows the victim while working while drunk, and the victim “I do not know about her snick. I do not report. E. I.)”; (b) the Defendant stated that the male customer was “I will dyke the bicycle” before the coffee specialty door, and the male customer was able to see that “I will dyke the bicycle?” but, without disregarding this, the customer was able to see that “I will dyke the bicycle?” and the customer was fyer of the coffee, so that the customer was frank out of the coffee specialty specialty, so he was unable to boldly 25 minutes.

The Defendant, by force, interfered with the victim’s coffee specialty business.

3. Defendant who interferes with the business of October 9, 2016, shall be punished by the penalty surcharge on October 2016.

arrow