Defendant

A The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant

B Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1, 2.0

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On November 201, 2010, when a personal document forgery D had sexual traffic at a personal trading business establishment located in California, California, L&A, and had it returned to the Republic of Korea due to the expiration of the term of stay in the United States while engaging in sexual traffic at a personal trading business establishment, it received a visa from the United States, and requested the forgery of a document to a personal document, a non-personal bropier, which forges the application document of the United States, to continue sexual traffic while staying for a long time, and received the contact information of the defendant, the president of the FFI.

On February 2, 2011, the Defendant, at the “F U.S. Research Institute” of the Defendant’s operation of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building 401, attempted to forge the certificate of employment necessary for the application of the U.S. study visa from the above D and receive KRW 4.20,000.

On March 7, 2011, the Defendant received 420,000 won from D, and without authority, served as the head of the business in the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, as the head of the business division, from January 2, 2001 to January 20, 201.

“Preparation of a certificate of employment to the effect that “,” and affix the I’s seal drawn up in advance.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, forged I's employment certificate (the representative's omitted) which is a private document on fact proof for the purpose of uttering.

B. On March 9, 2011, the Defendant, at the “J” coffee shop near the office of the U.S. Embassy in the Republic of Korea in Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul Embassy in the Republic of Korea, delivered to the said D a forged certificate as referred to in paragraph 1-A, and D, at around 16:00 the same day, submitted the forged certificate of employment to the office of the U.S. embassy in the Republic of Korea as if it was a document duly formed with a history and staff who knew of the above fact.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, used a forged private document.

2. Defendant B

A. A. Around September 18, 2014, the Defendant of an official document forgery is personal information at the Defendant’s residence in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K and 603 Dong 1401.