logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고정615
수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of B corporation in Kimhae-si F, and the defendant B corporation is a corporation established for the purpose of the government and the business of manufacturing ebials.

It is difficult to maintain environmental standards due to water pollutants discharged from discharge facilities in the upper region of the water source protection area, special measures area and the upper region of the special measures area, areas where water intake facilities are installed, and the upper region of the water source protection area, or there is a

The Minister of Environment may not install discharge facilities that discharge specific water-quality harmful substances in an area designated as "area subject to the restriction on the installation of discharge facilities", and a person who intends to install other discharge facilities shall obtain permission from the Minister of Environment as prescribed by Presidential Decree.

1. From January 2014 to March 25, 2016, the Defendant established two parts of the CNC Line (total capacity of 0.59 cubic meters, 290 L/ 300 L/ 300 L/ 300) with two parts of the CNC Line (total capacity of 0.59 cubic meters, 290 L/ 300 L/ 100 L/ 100) as well as two parts of the CNC Line’s operation in F, which was designated by the Minister of Environment as an area subject to the restriction on the installation of wastewater discharge facilities in the river basin below the river basin.

2. Defendant B, a representative director, in relation to the Defendant’s in the same date, time, and place as in the preceding paragraph, did not obtain permission for the installation of wastewater discharge facilities as above, and even if the installation of wastewater discharge facilities was restricted by discharging specific water-quality harmful substances more than the standard concentration, Defendant B established two parts of the CNC Line (total capacity of 0.59 cubic meters, 290 L/ 300 L/ 400 cubic meters).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying materials;

1. The relevant Article of the Act and the defendant A who is selected to commit the crime: Water quality and punishment;

arrow