logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고정618
수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A A In-house director of (State)B in the window C of Changwon-si, and Defendant (State)B is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing agricultural machinery.

It is difficult to maintain environmental standards due to water pollutants discharged from discharge facilities in the upper region of the water source protection area, special measures area and the upper region of the special measures area, areas where water intake facilities are installed, and the upper region of the water source protection area, or there is a

The Minister of Environment may not install emission facilities discharging specific water-quality harmful substances in an area designated as "area subject to the restriction on the installation of emission facilities", and a person who intends to install other emission facilities shall obtain permission from the Minister of Environment as prescribed by Presidential Decree.

1. From January 2008 to March 23, 2016, Defendant A, the Minister of Environment, at the window CB of Changwon-si, designated as an area subject to the restriction on the installation of facilities discharging wastewater from the flow of the river basin, the Minister of Environment set up more than 12 parts of the CNC Line 9 and machine learning center 3.7 cubic meters of the water storage capacity (c. 3.7 cubic meters of the water storage capacity) and operated the facility without obtaining permission for installation of wastewater discharge facilities.

2. The Defendant (State B) set up 12 parts of the CNC Line 9 and the SPS Center 12 parts of the 3.7 cubic meters of accommodation storage capacity (c. 3.7 cubic meters of accommodation storage capacity) without obtaining permission for the installation of wastewater discharge facilities as above from the internal directors, in relation to the Defendant’s business at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, even if the installation of wastewater discharge facilities is restricted by discharging specific water-quality hazardous substances more than the standard concentration.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying materials;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow