Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from around 21:00 to around 21:30 on May 25, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by threat of force, such as: (b) 'E restaurant operated by the victim D (n, 54 years of age) located in Daegu-gu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu; (c) 'E restaurant' on the ground that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and the victim became the principal of the house; and (d) 'FR’ attached two cafeterias at the cafeteria; and (e) 'FR’ attached two cafeterias on the ground that the victim became the principal of the cafeteria; and (e) 'FFR’ caused the victim to enter the said cafeteria, thereby obstructing the victim's restaurant business.

On June 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 01:01 on June 17, 201, the Seo-gu Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City C D’s “E” restaurant, and (b) the police officers, etc., who were dispatched upon receipt of the report, carried the Defendant’s ped away from the foregoing D to another place. The Defendant was able to find the Defendant’s pedal and pedal the pedal, and the Defendant was staying in the vicinity, and considered the situation.

The Defendant, at around 01:20 on the same day, was traveling along the entrance door to the above restaurant by a police officer G, etc. on the same day, and, in order to receive a removal from the above police officer G, etc., the Defendant “I am off. I am frith. I am frith, but I am frith, h., this g.” from the above G.

In order to hear the word "", he collected the word "A, I am feas, I am feas, I am son, I am son, I am the face part of the above G in one time with the right-hand part, the face part of the above G in one time with the right-hand part, and the part of the above G in one way with the right-hand part of the above G in the course of the patrol when he was arrested as a current offender at around 01:25 on the same day, and the face part of the above G was arrested as a head in the course of the patrol.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers in the process of performing duties such as the maintenance of order and the prevention of crimes, thereby hindering legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 1317]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each 112 Declaration.