logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.07.03 2014노3489
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

(a) It is a media product harmful to juveniles, in which three physical form of a misunderstanding of facts (not guilty part) are linked to each other and the balon number of which is indicated along with the pictures taken by him/her;

B. The sentencing of the lower court on unreasonable sentencing (Defendant A: imprisonment for eight months, two years of the suspended sentence, two years of the probation, two years of the community service order, Defendant B: imprisonment for eight months, two years of the suspended execution, two years of the probation, two years of the probation, and one hundred and sixty hours of the community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The summary of the facts charged in this part of the facts charged is as follows: Defendant A and B made and distributed a prestigious box for “sexual traffic advertisement”, and employed male employees in charge of the distribution of the prestigious paper and the transportation of sexual traffic women, and conspired to conduct sexual traffic mediation business by half the profits. The Defendants employed D as an employee in charge of the distribution of prestigious paper and the transportation of sexual traffic women, and distributed D prestigious paper to D from May 2, 2014 to May 2, 2014, and distributed the prestigious paper directly from May 19, 2014 to May 25, 2014 to the police. Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with the aforementioned prestigious paper to be distributed from May 20, 2014 to May 25, 2014 to the place where the general public passes through the prestigious paper.

As a result, the Defendant aided and abetted the act of distributing the above name cards, which are media materials harmful to juveniles, to the public, at places where the general public pass through.

B. According to Articles 59 subparag. 4 and 19(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act, the lower court’s determination is publicly offered at a place where the general public pass media products harmful to juveniles.

arrow