Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, each of the defendants B, C, D, E, F, and G shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

except that the defendant C, D, E, F.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On March 30, 2012, the District Court sentenced 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) to the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which became final and conclusive

L and Defendant A, by misrepresenting the victims who have sent the text of loan to a financial institution and making it possible to make loans available through document work, shall receive money from another person’s account secured in advance under the pretext of document work expenses, cost of surety insurance policy, etc. on or around April 2013, Defendant A, who leased an officetel in the name of 1445 of the MM building, employed other Defendants, sent the text of loan through a large-scale text transmission company, issued a mobile phone serial phone number sent to other Defendants from time to time to time, and notified other Defendants of the deposit account in the name of others, and then, Defendant B, C, D, E, F, and G falsely concluded that “a fee for document work expenses, cost of surety insurance policy, etc. shall be paid to the victims who have contacted the mobile phone,” and Defendant A collected the account number from the victims and conspired to receive the money from the victims.

On April 15, 2013, the Defendants were transferred 1.4 million won from the victim on the same day on the following day by stating that “The Defendants were working in our financing, and are paying fees, such as the cost of opening the Maspbook.”

From around that time to May 14, 2013, the Defendants were transferred KRW 224,59,000 in total by a similar method over 155 times in total as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table at the above officetel office (from May 2, 2013, Defendant E was involved in the crime from May 2, 2013).

As a result, the defendants conspired to acquire the victims' property.