logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.19 2014고단330 (1)
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year;

(b) [2014 order 330] Nos. 1 to 32 of the evidence of the case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 30] [2014 Highest 1132] [2] [2014 Highest 1620]

1. The Defendants’ joint criminal conduct with K, L, and L in collusion with K (as of February 5, 2014, detained on separate occasions), L (as of January 25, 2014) and name-free boxes in China. The facts are as follows: (a) creating a fake sexual traffic site, such as M, in which many women’s pictures and names are posted, by visiting many unspecified victims under the conditions; (b) soliciting victims who have access to such site to demand payment of commercial sex acts by telephone or hosting; (c) inducing victims who have access to such site to receive money from the designated account and transfer money to the designated account; (d) having contact with Chinese accomplices, Defendant B played the role of creating another person’s name recruitment and distribution telephonephones; (e) having been provided with personal identification cards in the name of another person; and (e) having been provided with the Defendant’s personal identification cards from the Defendant C, a person responsible for the management of the Defendant C, who was provided with the Defendant’s personal identification cards in the name of another person; and (e) having provided the Defendant C’s personal identification cards from the Defendant C.

Since then, on November 6, 2013, at least 10:30 on the 10:30th day of November 201, 2013, the false statement stating that the Defendant B, who was contacted by the Chinese side, was “to pay the price to the victim only if he/she pays the price.” This was deposited the sum of KRW 600,000 from November 22:34, 2013 to the Agricultural Cooperative (P) account in the name of the victim three times, and the Defendant B, who was contacted by the Chinese side, was immediately the Defendant A through the Defendant C.

arrow