Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.

Defendant 1 through 7 of seized evidence.

Criminal facts

Defendant

B On August 29, 2012, the Suwon District Court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for violating the Military Service Act and two years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on September 6, 2012, and is currently under suspended execution.

The Defendants, in collusion with the false names, ordered the government agencies in China to transfer cash to the bank cash withdrawal machine or Internet financial transaction system, etc. by inducing the victim to use the fraudulent name theft, loan, etc., in collusion with the false names of the victims, and ordered them to transfer the money to the bank account in advance by inducing the victim through the Internet financial transaction system, etc., the Defendants followed the money by the so-called "Sishing" method, which withdraws and delivers the money acquired through such deception to China. ① The Chinese General Book (Korean Organization Management Call Center, remittance, withdrawal, and solicitation of passbook), ② the Korean General Book (Korean Chief Book, under the Chinese General Book, and deposited money deposited in the passbook), ③ the Korean Book (Korean General Book and Korean General Book, and directly withdraws the money deposited in the passbook), ④ the remittance book (componing and transfer the money deposited in China to China) and ⑤ the passbook to use it in collecting the money and deliver the passbook to Kwikkset and service).

Specifically, the Defendants, who are in charge of cash withdrawal measures among the above roles, conspired to receive 2% of the amount of the withdrawal by putting the cash card in the name of another person at the place of promise under the direction of the said telephone financial fraud group, withdrawing the amount of damage, and delivering it to the person who is not the party to the name.

1. On November 3, 2013, Defendant A’s name-free person who was named as Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct refers to the victim F by phoneing it to the victim F and paying 20% of the fee for repayment of the loan previously borrowed to obtain a low interest loan.” Accordingly, Defendant A’s name-free person is the G Nong Bank account (H) and I, a single account in the name of the victim F on November 4, 2013.