Punishment against the Defendants shall be prescribed as one year of imprisonment.

In respect of the defendants of the applicant for compensation, it is against the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a director of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd established for the purpose of real estate development, etc. on August 2, 2016, and Defendant B is the representative of that company.

On July 12, 2016, the Defendants concluded a joint contract with the I stating that they are actually representatives of the F.F. (director G, Auditor H) in order to jointly receive the sale of the said redevelopment project, and attempted to receive money under the pretext of the loan by approaching the victim C who was aware of the project outlook through the introduction of the paper while hiding the project prospects.

1. The Defendants who forged private documents will not attract investment in the business fund or borrow money in the agreement with I. The decision that it would not be reasonable for the Defendants to attract investment in the business fund, and that the agreement would be forged as if the LAD entered into a direct contract with the LAF. After Defendant A, around August 31, 2016, printed out the co-owner column of the contract stored in the computer from the Defendants’ office in Seocho-gu in Seocho-gu, Seoul, as an official column on August 31, 2016, by printing it into the column of the co-owner agreement stored in the computer, and then the inspection was made in color-type “A” column of the parties concerned, stating “(ju)” as “A”, and Defendant B arbitrarily affixed the FOH seal of the representative director of the KEOH at the same day, and Defendant B affixed the “B” column of the parties concerned.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge the joint acceptance agreement in the name of the F Bank of Korea without authority for the purpose of exercising.

2. On September 2016, the Defendants’ exercise of the above investigation documents and fraud explained to the Defendant on behalf of the police officer in the middle of September 2016, that he/she has the right to vicariously sell 800 households among the apartment buildings of the Housing Redevelopment Association in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-gu, with his/her own political power, and immediately entered the sale of the land. Defendant B is the number of universities, and Defendant B is the number of universities and requires deposit to be given to the executor

12. 31. The amount of KRW 300,00 if the contract is concluded to allow the Defendants to act on behalf of another selling company.