The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the facts or misapprehension of the legal principles) Defendant A did not have the intent or ability to follow the right to vicariously sell O reconstruction commercial buildings, and even if Defendant B borrowed KRW 90 million from the injured party in a well-known manner, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles by recognizing the Defendants not guilty, or by misapprehending the legal principles.

2. Determination

A. Defendant A, who entered into a sales agency contract with the O Housing Reconstruction Association and the sales agency contract, delegated the right to a sales agency, and Defendant A again planned to execute the sales agency by acquiring the right to a sales agency from the H of the L-A-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U

B. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, the agreement to the KO Housing Reconstruction Association in February 15, 2012 (Evidence No. 308, hereinafter referred to as "the first agreement") was entered into with X and Y to transfer all of the business affairs of selling O reconstruction commercial buildings in KRW 300 million (Evidence No. 308, hereinafter referred to as "the evidence No. 308"), and the sales affairs of the first agreement shall be governed by the KO Housing Reconstruction Association and the KO Housing Reconstruction Association, but the deposit amount of KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00.