logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.02.23 2017고합424
배임수재
Text

Defendant

A and B Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant C for a fine of KRW 3,00,000, and Defendant D and E for a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A shall be in charge of the affairs related to the construction and sale of a commercial building as a full-time director of the HF association established by the director of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “G BG BG T” (hereinafter “H association”) and the H association as a full-time director of the H association, and Defendant B shall exercise overall control over the affairs of H association as the president of the H association and the representative director of the I “H association”. Defendant C shall be the representative of the H association and the KJJ which conducted a sales agency contract with the H association, and Defendant D shall be the representative of the H association and the K K LJ which entered into a construction contract with the H association, and Defendant E shall be the representative of the K LJ which formed the K and the consortium, which entered into a joint construction contract (hereinafter “the corporation”). As above, Defendant A and B’s joint crime of selling commercial buildings shall select a sales agency with the representative of the H association to return 50% of the sales commission to 20% of the sales commission from the K association to 30% of the sales agency.

After that, Defendant A received cash amounting to KRW 250 million on November 27, 2014, around KRW 100 million on February 4, 2015, KRW 50 million on February 16, 2015, and KRW 50 million on February 16, 2015, from the above office located in Gangseo-gu Seoul N, which is operated by Defendant A, on three occasions, from the office of Gangseo-gu Seoul, and delivered KRW 245 million on December 2014 to Defendant B among them.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to handle the affairs of H association and received 400 million won in exchange for an illegal solicitation in connection with the duties of H association.

2. As above, Defendant A’s representative D prepared a contract with the total construction cost of KRW 19.32 billion and returned KRW 1.755 billion by adding the bid price submitted by the contractor to KRW 1.75 billion to the bid price submitted by the contractor.

arrow