1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff filed an application with Changwon District Court C, D for the attachment and assignment order (the debtor B, the third debtor, the defendant, the claim amount of 9,805,669 won, the claim amount of 9,805,669 won, and the claim amount of the lease deposit against the third debtor, which the debtor has against the third debtor. The above court ordered the attachment and assignment order on December 3, 1998 and the above assignment order was delivered to the defendant around that time. Thus, the above court ordered the attachment and assignment order on December 3, 1998 and the above assignment order became final and conclusive after that time.

2. The decision was made by the Plaintiff and B, an executory notarial deed No. 594, 1998, in a day between the Plaintiff and B.

However, according to the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, a notarial deed with executory power of No. 594, No. 598, which was prepared every day between F and B, is prepared between F and B, and based on the fact that F and B were ordered to seize and seize claims against the debtor B and the third debtor as the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant of this case against the defendant of this case is without merit.

In addition, the data submitted by the Plaintiff alone are insufficient to recognize that B entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant with the Defendant for the 102 dong 608, 102, and 608, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant for the full amount of money against the Defendant

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant in this case against the defendant is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.