logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.08.05 2015가단26384
채무부존재확인
Text

1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On the basis of an executory deed No. 2813 of the 1991 Document No. 2813, which was issued by Defendant B against the Plaintiff, Defendant B applied for the attachment and assignment order of the claim against the Plaintiff on August 13, 1991, with respect to the benefit claim that the Plaintiff had against the Plaintiff, based on the obligor as the Plaintiff, the garnishee as the Plaintiff, the third obligor as the Plaintiff, and the amount of the claim KRW 10,953,558, and issued the attachment and assignment order. The above attachment and assignment order was served on the parties around that time.

B. On the basis of an executory deed No. 6393, 191, which was issued by a notary public against the Plaintiff, Nonparty F applied for the attachment and assignment order of the claim against the Plaintiff on August 19, 191, with respect to the benefit claim that the Plaintiff had against the Plaintiff, based on the fact that the debtor was the Plaintiff, the garnishee was the Plaintiff, and the amount of the claim was KRW 30,092,60, and the amount of the claim was KRW 30,000. Nonparty F received an order for attachment and assignment of the claim on August 19, 191. The above attachment and assignment order was served on the parties at that time and became final and conclusive at that time.

C. On the basis of an executory deed No. 5466 of the 1991 Document No. 5466, which was issued by the defendant C, a notary public against the plaintiff, the debtor is the plaintiff, the third debtor is the plaintiff, the amount of the claim is KRW 20,047,60, and the plaintiff requested the Jeonju District Court L, M to order the seizure and collection of the claim against the Jeonju City. On September 4, 191, the defendant C issued the seizure and collection order, and the above seizure and collection order was served on the parties around that time.

Defendant D had against the Plaintiff on the basis of an executory deed No. 282 of the 1991 Document No. 282, which was executed by a notary public against the Plaintiff, with the amount of claim KRW 10,041,40, the debtor as the Plaintiff, the third debtor as the Plaintiff, and the amount of claim KRW 10,041,40.

arrow