1. The plaintiffs' primary claims and the plaintiff's conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2.(a)

Hanchi Co., Ltd. and D.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) D On September 24, 2013, a notary public lent KRW 160,00,000 to Kanbuk Law Firm (hereinafter “Korea Forest”) on September 30, 2013 as a notarial deed (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) stating that “If the repayment of the above loan is delayed at the due date, there is no objection even if there is a compulsory execution” (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”). D is a notarial deed (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) signed on September 24, 2013 as the notarial deed of this case, stating that “A notary public extended KRW 160,00,000 to Kanbuk Law Firm (hereinafter “Korea Forest”), and Han chi will repay the above loan by September 17, 2013.”

2) On October 2, 2013, D drafted the instant notarial deed, as follows: (a) on October 2, 2013, D: (b) on the basis of the instant notarial deed, the debtor Hancheon-si, the third debtor Kimcheon-si, and (c) on the claim amounting to KRW 160,000,000, the amount of loan interest of KRW 160,000,000, the Han-do shall be paid by Kimcheon-si; and (b) D

(C) On July 31, 2013, the Korea Forest Corporation F was awarded a subcontract for the development project from Hancheon-si to the forest service industry, etc. that was ordered by Kimcheon-si to the development project on November 7, 2013. Meanwhile, the original copy of the decision of the seizure and assignment order was served on Kimcheon-si on October 7, 2013.

2 D, on November 8, 2013, between F’s representative C and F’s representative director C, decided to repay 160,000,000 won of the debt owed to C by the notary public G office No. 14119 on November 30, 2013. To secure this, D’s entire amount of the instant debt is equal to or below the entire amount of the claim pursuant to D’s decision on the seizure and assignment order of the instant claim that D has against Kimcheon-si.