beta
Text
1. The defendant shall pay 180,000,000 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from July 1, 2014 to the day of complete payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On May 28, 2013, based on the executory exemplification of a notarial deed in the case No. 568 of the 2009 deed No. 568, a notary public received a loan and goods payment from B and C, a notary public obtained an order to seize and seize a claim of KRW 600,000,000 among the lease deposit return claims against B with the debtor and the defendant as the third party debtor, and a notary public obtained an order to seize and seize the claim of KRW 600,000 among the lease deposit return claims against B by having the defendant as the debtor and the defendant as the third party debtor; based on the executory exemplification of the notarial deed in the case No. 845 of the 2010 deed No. 845 of the 2010 deed, a notary public received an order to seize and seize each claim of KRW 60,700,000 among the lease deposit claims against the debtor and the defendant as the third party debtor; and each assignment order was issued to the defendant around the time.
(hereinafter referred to as “the First Claim Attachment and Assignment Order”) .B.
In addition, on December 26, 2013, based on the executory exemplification of the 2009 deed No. 568 of the above law firm North Joint Law Office, the Plaintiff issued an order to seize and seize the claim of KRW 90,000,000 among the claim for the refund of the lease deposit against the Defendant in the Suwon District Court of Suwon-do as the obligor and the Defendant as the garnishee, and the above notary public issued an order to seize and seize the claim of KRW 90,00,000 among the claim for the refund of the lease deposit against the Defendant in the third party as the obligor. Based on the executory exemplification of the 2010 deed No. 845 of the 2010 deed No. 845 of the 2013, Dec. 18, 2013, with the obligor and the Defendant as the garnishee as the obligor and the Defendant as the third party obligor, and each order to seize the claim of KRW 90,000,000 among the lease deposit claims against the Defendant
(hereinafter referred to as “the second claim attachment and assignment order”) c. ‘the above claim attachment and assignment order’.
B and C are the second.