The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, misunderstanding of facts, only once, used the victim’s arms, and did not commit an injury by assaulting the victim’s inside part of the arms.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that convicted the defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence of the lower court (an amount of KRW 1,00,000) that is unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below on the assertion of mistake of facts, the fact that the defendant inflicted an injury by assaulting a victim's inner part as stated in the facts constituting an offense in the court below was proved without any reasonable doubt. Thus, the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant is just and acceptable, and there is no illegality that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts as alleged by the defendant.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

① 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 ‘ 피고인이 정차 후 내려서 피해자가 타고 있는 차 조수석 쪽으로 다가오더니 차를 발로 찼으며, 피해자가 조수석 창문을 열고 사과하였는데 갑자기 손으로 안면 부를 폭행하였다’ 는 취지로 진술하는 바, 피해 경위의 진술이 대체로 일관되고 상세하여 신빙이 간다.

② 반면 피고인은 경찰 조사를 받으면서는 피해자의 어깨 부위를 양손으로 쓸어내렸다는 취지로 진술하였다가, 원심 법정에서는 팔을 한 번 터치한 것뿐이라고 진술하였으며, 당시 현장에 출동하였던 경찰관은 원심 법정에 증인으로 출석하여 ‘( 피고인이)“ 일어서 서 그냥 가슴팍 부위를 한 번 정도 밀쳤다” 고는...