logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.12.12 2018노4947
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the misunderstanding of the fact that the defendant saw that he was seated on the side of the bus and flabed with the victim's flab, but this was the victim's flab, first of all, and was the victim's flab and was the minimum resistance, and it was the victim's flab, as stated in the judgment of the court below, and the judgment of the court below guilty the defendant.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (300 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts, namely, ① the victim consistently made a statement to the effect that the defendant was aware of the victim’s head from the investigative agency to the court of the court below (Evidence No. 33 of the evidence record, No. 79 of the trial record), ② the victim made a statement that the victim was aware of the victim’s head, and ② the victim was aware of the part where the victim was aware of the victim’s head, and the damaged part confirmed in the photograph immediately after the instant case conforms to the victim’s statement. ③ The victim visited the hospital on the day of the instant crime, under the diagnosis of “the open upper part of the victim’s cryp,” and was subject to the diagnosis of “the open upper part of the victim’s face”, and the victim directly caused the victim’s injury to the extent that he was in need of the victim’s face combined

In light of the fact that there is no particular reason to see, the defendant's above assertion is without merit since it can be sufficiently recognized the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below.

B. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant did not seriously reflect the instant crime; (b) did not recover damage at all; and (c) the injured party wanted to be punished by the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (b) all other circumstances constituting conditions for sentencing, such as the circumstances after the crime.

arrow