beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal does not contain any fact that the defendant used to assault and injure the victim, and only defend the victim against the assault and defense, but the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts.
2. Determination
A. On July 9, 2015, the Defendant was the president of the Busan Southern-gu Seoul apartment occupant representative meeting, and around 22:00, the 302 large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale
In response, the defendant also assaulted the victim with both arms, pushed the victim's breast part with the two arms, pushed the victim's inside part with the right part, pushed the victim's inside part with the victim's inside part, thereby committing assaulting the victim, leading the victim to approximately two weeks of treatment.
B. The lower court determined as follows: (a) The facts acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court are as follows: (b) CCTV images were separated by the Defendant and D, and (c) the Defendant’s Da and the Defendant was sealed to the lower part of the left part of the CCTV screen; and (d) if the Defendant and D were able to be able to back to the lower part of the screen of the video screen 21:57:53, when the Defendant and D moved to the lower part of the front part of the video screen, on the 21:57:53, when the Defendant was pushed up with D with the upper part of the front part of the video screen, and then the Defendant was separated by the Defendant and D’s horses after the completion of the meeting at around 21:59:15 on the day of the instant case; and (c) when the Defendant was able to have a woman’s body inside a small body or a small body, the Defendant was able to have a woman sturd with it.