logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고정1787
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in self-business.

From around 09:10 on May 24, 2017 to around 09:29, the Defendant, in the process of voting to dismiss the victim D (59 years of age, 59) who is the representative of the Dong from office in front of 101 Dong-2 1-2 Ra, an apartment house 101 Dong-dong 101 Dong Dong-dong 1-2 Ra, Dong-dong 101 Dong-dong 1-2 Ra, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, the Defendant: (a) embezzled the victim with the victim in breach of trust; and (b) inflicted an injury upon the victim in need of medical treatment for seven days of age due to the cambling, etc. by assaulting one part of his arms on the part of his arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. The defendant asserts that the victim's medical certificate of injury [the defendant is merely the victim's cell phone because he tried to photograph the victim's cell phone by photographing the victim's cell phone, and there is only the victim's cell phone, and there is no assault against the victim.

그러나 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자는 이 법정에서, 당시 피고인이 종이( 플라스틱 재질의 파일 )를 들고 있던 손이 아니라 다른 쪽 팔을 휘둘러서 자신의 코를 쳤고, 그날 저녁까지 코가 찡했다고

Specifically stated in this Court, ② E, witnessing the situation at the time, stated in this Court that the defendant was not a hand who saw the other arms, but the victim was faced with the nose of the victim, and the victim was flicking at the time when she was flick, ③ the victim reported 112 at the time, received medical treatment at the hospital on that day, ④ the defendant committed selling to the victim at the intention of prohibiting the defendant from taking photographs at the time.

In light of the distance between the defendant and the victim and the degree of shock by the victim, there was an intentional injury to the defendant.

In full view of the fact that the facts charged in this case are seen to be fully convicted, etc.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 257 of the choice of punishment.

arrow