Defendant

A, B, and C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,00,000, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:20 on September 12, 2015, Defendants were arguing in dispute with the difference in business-related opinions on the “F” restaurant located in Spocheon-si, Ma. Defendant C, upon receiving the report of 112, was subject to a disposition of disturbance from Defendant C, who was dispatched to the site, as a disturbance, Defendant A expressed that the patrol lane on which the slope He was on board “I am shot, cut, cut off, and you am.” While Defendant C expressed a desire that “I am shot, am swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe sswe swe

Accordingly, when Defendant A was arrested by Defendant A as a current offender interfering with the performance of official duties by Defendant A, and she was on board the patrol vehicle, Defendant B: (a) she pushed her chest by hand; (b) she was sealed by a slope H’s right shoulder by hand; and (c) Defendant C her “Ne bit bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch son who is to be done by the police.

Defendant D, while carrying out a bath, she pusheded her chest, and Defendant D her boomed, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

In addition, when Defendant B was arrested by Defendant B as a current offender interfering with the performance of official duties from Defendant C, Defendant C took a bath that “I see why the police is draw and farb far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far, and Defendant D arrested a female.”

N. N.N. Doz.

In this hacker’s hack and assaulted a patrolman by putting his arms and body into force.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression of crimes and arrest of flagrant offenders with I who are police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to I and H;

1. Each written investigation report by J and K (on-site recording CD reproduction verification) by the Act and subordinate statutes.