Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are residents of the D Apartment-si, Namyang-si.

1. Defendant A

A. At around October 17, 2015, the Defendant, on the street in front of the apartment complex of the foregoing D 1302, and was present at the “Korea-mast Singing Singing Singinging Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singinging Singing Singinging Singing Singing Singinging Singinging Singinging Singinging Singinging Singinging Singinging Singinging Singinginging Singinging Singinging Singinging Singinging

B. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (a) and committed violence against police officers E, who were called out upon receiving 112 reports as above, by taking the right shoulder’s hand, and tightly tightly shaking the shoulder’s uniforms.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who is a police official, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the reporting processing of E- 112.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1-A, was present at the apartment complex, and at the time, at the apartment complex site, reported that the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender due to the fact of Paragraph 1-b above, but, among the residents’ number of people, expressed the victim E with the large interest of “I am, I am, I am, I am, and I am am, I am the victim openly insulting.”

B. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in Paragraph 1(a) of Article 1, assaulted the Defendant, who was arrested the said A as a current offender with the view to obstructing the performance of official duties, and assaulted the Defendant, by putting the said police officer’s arms onto G, etc., and by taking a bath to E, and assaulting the Defendant at one time at the right face of drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a police official, interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders in F, G and E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement 1.