beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 201, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with a copy of a market price unclaimed prescription (for the submission of a pharmacy) held in the “D mountain father and son,” which was operated by the victim C in Sung-nam-si B, Sung-gu.
2. On September 26, 2014, the Defendant forged private document: “A, F”, “A,” and “A, F,” and “A, F,” written in the name column for prescription prescription in the name of the Defendant’s dwelling room located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sung-si, Sung-si, Sung-si, Ma10 Dong-dong, 1304, and written in the column for prescription, “30 days” and “C,” and “A, F,” in the column for name of prescription prescription.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant: (a) forged a prescription in the name of C, a private document on fact verification; and (b) committed each of the following acts: (c) around November 3, 2016, the Defendant committed a prescription in the name of C, a private document on fact verification 18 times in the same manner as the one in the list of crimes in attached Table 1.
3. On September 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) issued and used a prescription under the name of C (for the submission of a pharmacy) in the name of the doctor C, a private document related to the verification of the forged fact, to a pharmacist who is aware of the forgery at “H pharmacy” located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) and (c) exercised a prescription under the name of C, a private document related to the verification of the forged fact, in the same manner as in attached Table 2, from November 4, 2016 until November 4, 2016; and (d) exercised a prescription under the name of 18 of the doctor C, a private document related to the verification of the forged fact, in the same manner as in attached Table 2.
4. The Defendant, who violated the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., was disqualified for dealing with narcotics. However, on September 29, 2014, the Defendant issued a prescription under the name of C, which was forged to the pharmaceutical affairs I, as stated in the foregoing 3. Paragraph, from “H pharmacy located in G in the Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.”